Regime Switches , Agents ’ Beliefs , and Post - World War II U . S . Macroeconomic Dynamics Francesco Bianchi
نویسنده
چکیده
The evolution of the U.S. economy over the last 55 years is examined through the lens of a micro-founded model that allows for changes in the behavior of the Federal Reserve and in the volatility of structural shocks. Agents are aware of the possibility of regime changes and their beliefs matter for the law of motion underlying the macroeconomy. Monetary policy is identified by repeated fluctuations between a Hawk and a Dove regime, with the latter prevailing in the ‘70s and during the recent crisis. To explore the role of agents’beliefs I introduce a new class of counterfactual simulations: beliefs counterfactuals. If, in the ‘70s, agents had anticipated the appointment of an extremely conservative Chairman, inflation would have been lower and the inflationoutput trade-off more favorable. The large drop in inflation and output at the end of 2008 would have been mitigated if agents had expected the Federal Reserve to be exceptionally active in the near future. ∗I would like to thank the editor Enrique Sentana and three anonymous referees for exceptionally thoughtful comments. I am deeply indebted to Chris Sims for his guidance and advice. I am also grateful to Mark Watson, Efrem Castelnuovo, Cosmin Ilut, Nobuhiro Kiyotaki, David Lucca, Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, Barbara Rossi, Tom Sargent, Tao Zha, and all seminar participants at Princeton University, the Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the New York Area Workshop on Monetary Policy, University of Pennsylvania, University of Virginia, Northwestern University, Duke University, UCLA, New York University, Philadelphia Fed, Penn State, CREI-Pompeu Fabra, University of Bern, NBER Summer Institute, Society for Economic Dynamics Annual Meeting, Richmond Fed, College of William and Mary, Johns Hopkins University, CEMFI, for useful suggestions and comments. Part of this paper was completed while the author was visiting the Board of Governors, whose hospitality is gratefully acknowledged. Correspondence: Duke University, 213 Social Sciences Building, Box 90097, Durham, NC 27708-0097. E-mail: [email protected].
منابع مشابه
Regime Switches, AgentsBeliefs, and Post-World War II U.S. Macroeconomic Dynamics
The evolution of ination and output over the last 50 years is examined through the lens of a micro-founded model that allows for changes in the behavior of the Federal Reserve and in the volatility of structural shocks. Agents are aware of the possibility of regime changes and their beliefs have an impact on the law of motion underlying the macroeconomy. The results support the view that there...
متن کاملMacroeconomic Regime Switches and Speculative Attacks
This paper explains a currency crisis as an outcome of a switch in how monetary policy and fiscal policy are coordinated. The paper develops a model of an open economy in which monetary policy starts active, fiscal policy starts passive and, in a particular state of nature, monetary policy switches to passive and fiscal policy switches to active. The probability of the regime switch is endogeno...
متن کاملEA 4272 Large shocks in U . S . macroeconomic time series : 1860 – 1988 Olivier DARNE ( * ) Amélie
In this paper we examine the large shocks due to major economic or financial events that affected U.S. macroeconomic time series on the period 1860–1988, using outlier methodology. We show that these shocks can have temporary or permanent effects on the series and that most of them can be explained by the Great Depression, World War II and recessions as well as by monetary policy for the intere...
متن کاملDoes Neoclassical Theory Account for the Effects of Big Fiscal Shocks? Evidence from World War II
There is much debate about the usefulness of the neoclassical growth model for assessing the macroeconomic impact of fiscal shocks. We test the theory using data from World War II, which is by far the largest fiscal shock in the history of the United States. We take observed changes in fiscal policy during the war as inputs into a parameterized, dynamic general equilibrium model and compare the...
متن کاملChanges in Business Cycles: Evidence and Explanations
I n his 1959 Presidential Address to the American Economic Association, Arthur Burns (1960, p. 1) predicted, if not the end of business cycles in the United States, at least “progress towards economic stability.” The advent of stabilization policy, the end of bank runs, and structural changes in the economy all seemed destined to radically reduce short-run economic fluctuations in the postwar e...
متن کامل